Nueava

Blog › Education › Primary School (6–12) › How two South African primary schools tried to protect children's dignity, and what got in the way

Primary School (6–12) Published 2026-10-16 · 2 min read

How two South African primary schools tried to protect children's dignity, and what got in the way

Key Takeaways

1

The study interviewed eight school management team members (principals, deputy heads and departmental heads) in two public primary schools in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.

2

Leaders in both schools linked dignity to respect, fairness, inclusion and recognising each child's inherent worth, and promoted it through anti-bullying measures and supportive discipline.

3

School 1 leaders more often used rights and anti-bullying language, while School 2 leaders more often stressed belonging, shared values and home–school continuity.

In a qualitative study of eight school leaders in two South African primary schools (Frontiers in Education), leaders said weak parental involvement, inconsistent educator practices and limited resources held back their efforts to protect pupils' dignity.

Nueava also makes tools for families: SG P1 Ballot Compass, Weather Intelligence, Pitch Trainer, Beat Hive.

Bullying, humiliation, discrimination and harsh punishment can all undermine a child's sense of dignity at school. This study asked how school leaders understand children's right to dignity, and how they try to protect it day to day.

The researchers worked in two public primary schools in the Ehlanzeni District, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. They interviewed eight members of school management teams: principals, deputy heads and departmental heads. They also analysed school documents. This is a qualitative study, meaning it draws on people's words and experiences rather than counting results. The children themselves were not surveyed, and no child ages are given.

Leaders linked dignity to respect, fairness and belonging

The leaders described dignity as respect, fairness, inclusion and recognising each child's inherent worth. In both schools, they said they promoted it through several routes:

  • awareness initiatives
  • ethical leadership
  • putting school policies into practice
  • supportive discipline
  • anti-bullying measures
  • working with parents and others in the school community

One school spoke of rights, the other of belonging

The two schools stressed different things. Leaders at School 1 more often used explicit language about rights and anti-bullying. Leaders at School 2 more often talked about belonging, shared values, adults modelling respectful behaviour, and keeping home and school consistent with each other.

The study does not say which approach worked better. It only shows that dignity can be built in more than one way.

The obstacles: uneven teacher practice, thin resources and weak home links

The leaders said their efforts were held back by:

  • inconsistent practices among educators
  • limited resources
  • weak parental involvement
  • cultural and language differences
  • children's behavioural challenges
  • wider community influences

Because this is a view from school leaders, it may not match what teachers, parents or children would say. With only two schools and eight participants, the findings cannot be assumed to apply elsewhere. The study did not cover Singapore or other Asian school systems.

The authors recommend ongoing dignity and human-rights education for pupils and staff, staff training focused on dignity, clearer anti-bullying procedures, restorative discipline and stronger home–school collaboration. Restorative discipline means helping a child understand and repair harm rather than simply punishing.

Ideas from the study that parents can use

  1. Ask your child's school how bullying is reported and handled, since the authors call for clearer anti-bullying mechanisms.
  2. Ask whether discipline focuses on repairing harm, as the study's restorative approach recommends, rather than on punishment alone.
  3. Echo your child's school values at home and stay in touch with teachers, because leaders named weak parental involvement as a barrier.

Why this matters in Singapore

Primary school in Singapore runs from Primary 1 to Primary 6 and ends with the PSLE, scored in Achievement Levels (AL). Guides here help parents of 6–12 year olds with homework habits, reading, maths, screen time, sleep and the move from P1 to PSLE.

Source: Frontiers in Education · CC BY 4.0

Nueava is run by a Singapore parent with a background in data analytics, to help local families decide with evidence.

Drafted with AI from the cited source and checked automatically. Spotted an error? Tell us and we'll correct it. [email protected]

More research for parents of primary school children

More articles →

Tools from Nueava

← Primary School (6–12)